You updated your password.

Reset Password

Enter the email address you used to create your account. We will email you instructions on how to reset your password.

Reset Password Modal Form

Forgot Your Email Address? Contact Us

Exploring Metaphysics, 2nd Edition

Take a metaphysical journey from the atom to the multiverse as you explore some of the biggest questions that have puzzled philosophers for centuries.
Guidebook
 
 
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Deconstructionism I took this course with the expectation of exploring the history of metaphysics from ancient times to current. Is some respects, there was a review of metaphysics historically, but primarily, this course was about a professor who spent most of the course deconstructing western thought as to soul, free will, God, life after death, and so on. I have no problem with someone not spiritually oriented or one who is not open to a world after this one, but the constant drumbeat of tearing down all of western thought as to our core was very tiring. I would not waste time listening to this course if you want to explore the foundations of western thought on metaphysics. On the other hand, if you get joy on disproving everything from our traditions on metaphysics, then watch this, but you will not learn much.
Date published: 2026-10-27
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Author is systematically biased on imponderables Rather than "retire this guy" (which was the conclusion of one reviewer), I suggest that an additional course on metaphysics, featuring an author with alternative viewpoints on the metaphysics of the soul and free will, would be appropriate.
Date published: 2026-10-07
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Subject Matter Important Presenter Great The subject matter of this course includes some of the most important issues of our day and I found Professor Johnson an eloquent and effective presenter. Connections between lectures are wonderful and ideas presented truly inspiring - I whole heartedly recommend this course to anyone interested in the deepest questions and most important topics of our times.
Date published: 2026-09-26
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Fun to listen to, but som dogmatic and opinionated It's fun to listen to and he broaches some great topics. But he seems to be using this course as a platform to prove the truth of atheism, and he is dismissive of anything that doesn't fit into a physical materialist worldview. He tends to present his opinions and conclusions as the only "right" answer, and seems to practice his own version of confirmation bias. Also, I don't think a philosopher should be this quick to present himself as an expert in physics. He tends to present certain aspects of physics almost as settled science, when a lot of it is still open to debate. I think anyone who shares his worldview of strict physical materialism will enjoy this, and will have their view thoroughly reinforced and will not challenged to think about any alternatives.
Date published: 2026-09-25
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Dogmatic Indoctrination I enjoy Great Courses because the instructor usually teaches students to think for themselves, to draw their own conclusion. In this course the instructor teaches his own doctrine or ideology in a way that discourages questioning, critical analysis or the consideration of opposing views or evidence. Witness statements like NDEs clearly are not real and souls do not exist. It is more accurate to say NDEs have not been disproved, but they have not been conclusively proven as evidence of consciousness existing independently of the brain. I felt like I was having his worldview shoved down my throat. He leaves no room for disagreement. I do believe we have free will. I do not believe in determinism, I do not think education and eliminating poverty will stop crime. It's ok to disagree and to have a polite discussion but this was an attempt at indoctrination from a dogmatic atheist. I could only handle 2.5 lectures.
Date published: 2026-09-14
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Recommended Surprised to read the number of negative reviews on this course by Professor Johnson. I’m not of their number. I’ve enjoyed all his previous courses including this one. The subject fascinates me and I found Prof. Johnson’s delivery excellent. The first lectures however were tough going for me and it was difficult to absorb all that was being discussed. I think mostly because of the depth and complexity of the topics rather than any critical reflection of the lecturer as many past reviewers alleged. These particular lectures I can at least view these again to gain a clearer understanding. The second half of the course I found especially compelling, particularly Joehnson’s lectures on the widely held assumption of the historic, three omni creator God, Eistein’s Theories of Relativity and the confusing (at least to me) best understanding of Quantum Mechanics and their potential influence on previous, traditional philosophy. One shouldn’t blindly accept all of Johnson’s conclusions uncritically but he at least supports his views with sound scientific and philosophical evidence. Perhaps this is more at the heart of many of the critical reviews To further discussion on these issues it would be fascinating to see a debate/discussion between Prof. Johnson and the likes of William Lane Craig.
Date published: 2026-09-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Illuminative intro to metaphysical argumentation To me, as a 'hard' engineer and scientist, it has been fascinating and instructive to follow Professor Kyle's lines of metaphysical argumentation about concepts that are very real to our everyday lives. Considering the vastness of the field of metaphysical study, his choice of topics was spot-on to 'bring to life' his lessons about methods of metaphysical argumentation.
Date published: 2026-09-05
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Huge scope, very useful Different presenters strike me in different ways. Being a fan of Steven Gimbel, it took me a few lectures by Dr. Johnson to get with the program, but once I did, I was grateful for having access to it. Because the subject matter can touch on religious beliefs, it can be highly polarizing and contentious (as the reviews show.) The more I watched, the more I got a feel for how it is practiced, in particular, the generation of thought experiments, the exercise of reason and logic. I particularly appreciated the presentation of opposing views. I'm glad I stuck with it, but also realize it will need a second and probably third pass, with some study of the sources and references in between. I'm glad The Great Courses includes courses like this.
Date published: 2026-08-21
  • y_2026, m_10, d_31, h_5
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.48
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_3, tr_19
  • loc_en_CA, sid_60180, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=SUBMISSION_TIME, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_teachco
  • bvseo_sdk, p_sdk, 3.2.1
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 7.33ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
Exploring Metaphysics, 2nd Edition

Trailer

Why Study Metaphysics?

01: Why Study Metaphysics?

Although Aristotle is known as the father of metaphysics, he's not the one who gathered his writings and coined the term. In the thousands of years since Aristotle wrote his papers and lectures on the topic, philosophers and scientists have continued to work to develop answers to Aristotle's most significant questions--What is reality? Why does anything exist at all?--questions that are just as relevant today as they were in ancient Greece.

Do Souls Exist?

02: Do Souls Exist?

Explore substance dualism, the arguments for and against it, and its relationship to the soul hypothesis. If souls do not exist, does that mean we don't have beliefs, personalities, or emotions? Could there be an afterlife if there are no souls? See how an exploration of these questions, and their surprising answers, motivates a host of other metaphysical questions that we will explore in the upcoming lectures.

Are the Brain and Mind Identical?

03: Are the Brain and Mind Identical?

Learn about the issue known as "the hard problem of consciousness." Are the brain and the mind numerically the same thing? If they were, would that dissolve the hard problem? As you think more deeply, you'll see the problems with suggesting that the mind and brain are identical. And you might be surprised to discover that some philosophers think the hard problem may ultimately be unanswerable.

Does the Mind Have Causal Powers?

04: Does the Mind Have Causal Powers?

Consider two theories of mind--property dualism and epiphenomenalism. Is your mind an emergent property of your brain with its own causal powers? Or is it more like your shadow--caused by your body, but just along for the ride? And could a fundamental "psychological force" help us find the answer the hard problem of consciousness we have been looking for?

Do Minds Even Exist?

05: Do Minds Even Exist?

Would it help to eliminate minds from our study of metaphysics altogether and just assume they don't exist? Learn why this theory, called eliminativism, has a lot going for it, even though many think it can't possibility be true. Then explore how we might use all we've learned, and the concept of supervenience, to solve the hard problem of consciousness--but generate more questions. Could machines have minds? Do humans have free will?

Could Machines Have Minds?

06: Could Machines Have Minds?

Explore functionalism, the theory which suggests that mental states have a functional definition. For example, it wouldn't matter what a being's brain is made of; if it functions in the same way as a brain that produces a mind, then the being should be described as "minded." Obviously, this would apply to evolved alien beings? If they behave like us, they are minded like us. But what about computers? Could they have minds?

Will Machines Have Minds?

07: Will Machines Have Minds?

If you believe that machines could have minds, does that automatically mean that they will one day? Might they already? Explore "phi," integrated information theory, and the "grue" problem, to explore what we can and cannot know about the potential consciousness of Large Language Models (commonly called "AI").

Would an Android Be a Person?

08: Would an Android Be a Person?

If you saw the award-winning film Ex Machina, you've met Ava, certainly one of the most famous Android movie stars. But was she a person? Could an Android ever be a person? Explore the numerous characteristics that make a person a person, and the differences between intelligence, sapience, sentience, and self-awareness.

Does Psychology Preserve Personal Identity?

09: Does Psychology Preserve Personal Identity?

Do you have any memories from your childhood? If so, do those memories of childhood make you the same person you are now? Or do you have those memories because you've been the same person all along? Explore the veracity of the theory of psychological continuity. And what can we learn from that about the preservation of personal identity?

Does Physical Continuity Preserve Identity?

10: Does Physical Continuity Preserve Identity?

Given that the physical material of your body is gradually replaced over time--including the proteins inside your brain cells--what can be said about your physical continuity? Study the concept put forth by contemporary philosopher Peter Unger. His theory might seem intuitive to us at first glance, but how can we address the issue of vagueness?

Do Persons Even Exist?

11: Do Persons Even Exist?

Do we speak about persons just because it's convenient and because we have a very general sense of what we mean? Consider the possibility that nothing exists beyond bodies and experiences. Explore the "closest continuer" idea of philosopher Robert Nozick and the arguments that have been made against it. In the metaphysical sense, does "person" refer to anything real?

Is an Afterlife Possible?

12: Is an Afterlife Possible?

If there is no soul that exists and preserves numerical identity, does that necessarily mean there could not be an afterlife? Explore philosopher Peter van Inwagen's concepts regarding the afterlife. Although many people find his ideas extraordinarily strange, Van Inwagen argues that his proposal is the only logically possible way for a person's personal identity to be preserved in an afterlife.

Does the Future Exist?

13: Does the Future Exist?

Can statements about the future be true? If not, how could God know what the future holds? But if they are true, what makes them true? Wouldn't the future have to exist? But if the future already exists, is any alternate future possible? And If not, can we have free will. Explore the subjects of "temporal ontology" and divine foreknowledge, as we law the groundwork for a discussion on human free will.

Are You the Ultimate Cause of Your Actions?

14: Are You the Ultimate Cause of Your Actions?

Philosopher Immanuel Kant thought that if a person has free will, the causal story of why a person does what they do must trace back to that person and them alone. If what we decide to do is not ultimately up to us, then we are not acting freely even though we think we are. Explore what free will requires and how it is threatened by both determinism and indeterminism.

Is Determinism Compatible with Free Will?

15: Is Determinism Compatible with Free Will?

Explore classic compatibilism and semi-compatibilism and learn what these theories can teach us about free will and determinism. Could our world contain elements of both freedom and determinism, depending on how we define free will? And what about the libertarian view? Does it offer a better way to understand human choice and the world around us?

What If We Don't Have Free Will?

16: What If We Don't Have Free Will?

If we believed and admitted that we did not have free will, would we be unable to hold people responsible for their actions? Or should we even try? Would knowing we do not have free will keep us from finding meaning in our lives and achieving our full potential? Also, explore the teachings of philosophers such as Manuel Vargas and Daniel Dennett who address free will, but in a different way than you might have ever thought about it.

What Is Causation?

17: What Is Causation?

Examine what it means to suggest that one thing, A, is the cause of some other thing, B? Although it initially seems easy, upon examination it is very difficult to explain. To attempt to do so, philosophers have introduced the concept of possible worlds--which are not merely alternative universes, but descriptions of an entirely different reality. Learn about their philosophical value, regardless of whether they exist.

What Is God Like?

18: What Is God Like?

Examine the inconsistencies and contradictions within the traditional tri-omni (omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent) definition of God. Why do some modern philosophers and theologians want to abandon that definition while others believe the idea has coherence? And if all arguments supported by logic and reason fail, does that just mean that belief in God must be a matter of faith?

Does God Exist by Definition?

19: Does God Exist by Definition?

Examine the ontological argument and discover how it differs from almost every other philosophical argument developed over the past millennium. Explore its advantages over arguments that attempt to prove God's existence from observations about the world around us. If the argument works, belief in God would rest not merely on faith, but on reason itself--a conclusion that has fascinated philosophers for centuries.

Was the Cosmos Caused?

20: Was the Cosmos Caused?

Explore the cosmological arguments--philosophical attempts to prove God's existence by reasoning from the existence of the cosmos itself. Can the arguments of Thomas Aquinas, Gottfried Leibniz, the proponents of the Kalam Argument, and others succeed in establishing the existence of God? Or do they ultimately leap to the assumption of God's existence without fully justifying that step?

Was the Universe Designed?

21: Was the Universe Designed?

Examine the fine-tuning argument for God's existence and why so many find it persuasive. Fine-tuning would seem to be much more likely to happen if theism is true, and when we consider the many factors that are precisely needed to support life--from the strength of electromagnetism and gravity to the mass of neutrinos--it seems that the universe is "fine-tuned." And yet, as you'll learn, the fine-tuning argument is fraught with numerous flaws.

Does Special Relativity Impact Space-Time?

22: Does Special Relativity Impact Space-Time?

Although we tend to think of science and philosophy as two different realms, science originated as an offshoot of philosophy. And rarely has science had a more significant impact on philosophy than Einstein's theory of relativity. Explore the impact of Einstein's theories on the foundational question of metaphysics: what is reality?

Does General Relativity Impact Space-Time?

23: Does General Relativity Impact Space-Time?

Einstein developed relativity to avoid the conclusion that the aether (space itself) exists. But what relativity seems to entail that spacetime exists. Does Einstein's general theory of relativity contradict his own metaphysical views? Explore this question and how general relativity also entails omnitemporalism (the idea that the past, the present, and the future, all exist simultaneously). See how it raises questions is raises about free will and the possibility of time travel.

Is Time Travel Possible?

24: Is Time Travel Possible?

If Einstein's theory of relativity implies omnitemporalism--the view that the past, present, and future exist at the same time--what does that tell us about the possibility of time travel? Could a hyperspace tunnel connecting two distant points in spacetime exist? Explore what general relativity and quantum mechanics can tell us about the possibility of wormholes, time travel, and the real nature of time itself.

Quantum Mechanics I: What Is Light?

25: Quantum Mechanics I: What Is Light?

Explore some of the significant, surprising, and novel ideas philosophers learn from the study of quantum mechanics, one of the foundational branches of physics. It suggests that light is made of both waves and particles? But is that possible? What could that mean? Is there a way to understand this that makes sense? Explore how quantum mechanics tells us that the fundamental nature of reality is different than it intuitively seems.

Quantum Mechanics II: What Is Matter?

26: Quantum Mechanics II: What Is Matter?

Unlike the macroscopic world of our daily lives, quantum particles can possess properties that cannot be simultaneously measured or precisely known. Discover what we can and cannot know about a quon and how quantum mechanics challenges our most basic assumptions about reality. Can Schrödinger's Cat really be alive and dead at the same time?

Does Quantum Mechanics Describe Reality?

27: Does Quantum Mechanics Describe Reality?

Explore the concept of instrumentalism, the view that science is only an instrument for making successful predictions about the world. While instrumentalism might allow us to avoid the "weirdness" revealed by quantum mechanics, is what else it entails worth the cost? Explore whether the metaphysician should be satisfied with the suggestion that scientific theories don't describe reality.

How Should We Interpret Quantum Mechanics?

28: How Should We Interpret Quantum Mechanics?

Quantum mechanics tells us that subatomic particles can be two places at once, in two states at once, communicate with each other over long distances instantaneously, and be collapsed down into a particular state by our conscious observation. Is there a way to understand what this tells us about the world? Explore several thought experiments and theories philosophers have used to try to make sense of quantum mechanics.

Is There a Multiverse?

29: Is There a Multiverse?

In discussing quantum phenomena, we've said our observations cause the collapse of wave functions and make particular events occur. What if, instead of causing collapse, our observation makes us a part of it? Examine the multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics and discover the many issues it would solve, even though it might initially sound "crazy" to us.

Do We Live in a Simulation?

30: Do We Live in a Simulation?

Would we accept a seemingly ridiculous scenario if it answered all unanswered philosophical questions in metaphysics and incorporated what we know about the brain, quantum mechanics, artificial intelligence and every other issue? If so, we might need to accept that we live in a computer simulation. Discover what modern philosophers say about the concept and why they believe we must take the possibility seriously.

Overview Course No. 60180

More than 2,000 years ago, a Greek philosopher named Aristotle found himself preoccupied with some profound questions: What is reality? What does it mean to exist? What makes something the thing that it is? The questions weren’t new; many philosophers had asked them before, and many would ask them after. There’s even a good chance you’ve wondered about them yourself. Although much of what Aristotle wrote about the sciences has been supplanted by modern knowledge, the questions he asked in Metaphysics about the nature of reality still drive philosophical thought 2,000 years later.

In the 30 fascinating lectures of Exploring Metaphysics, 2nd Edition, philosopher David Kyle Johnson, PhD, shares classical answers to the questions posed in Metaphysics as well as modern ideas Aristotle would never have imagined. While many of the questions your professor shares are relatively new—for example, questions about time travel, wormholes, and multiple universes—some are the same questions Aristotle himself wrote about. Is there any scenario of reality that could satisfy these ancient questions and remain consistent with modern philosophy and scientific progress? Many modern philosophers believe there is. Not only would their answers have stunned Aristotle, but chances are you’ll be amazed as well. From quantum mechanics to wormholes, from Einstein’s theory of relativity to the possibility of an afterlife, and from artificial intelligence to the simulation hypothesis, your professor takes you on a wild metaphysical journey.

About

David Kyle Johnson

We can always take comfort in the fact that we can find and do embrace answers to metaphysical questions.

INSTITUTION
King's College

David Kyle Johnson is a Professor of Philosophy at King’s College in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. He earned his PhD in Philosophy from the University of Oklahoma. He has published papers on free will, the problem of evil, the multiverse, the existence of souls, and many related topics. His articles have appeared in a variety of journals, including Religious Studies, Philosophia Christi, and Think. He is the author of How (Why and When) to Think Scientifically and the editor in chief of the Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy.

By This Professor